## Smashing Java for Fun and Profit

Every Java programming forum or mailing list, I am subscribed to has hundreds of people asking the same question, "How can I prevent people from reversing my application?". Short answer is you can not prevent reverse engineering regardless of the programming language used, unfortunately Java/C# just makes the process a lot more easier. This post will go over the process of cracking a very simple Java application.

We begin with a very simple, "Hello, World!" application. Given a correct serial number, which is "1234" it will print "Hello World!" to the console, for any other serial it will exit without a prompt.

public class hello {

public static boolean checkSerial(String serial){
if (serial.equals("1234"))
return true;
else
return false;
}

public static void main (String args[]) {

if (args.length != 1){
System.err.println("Serial Needed..");
return;
}

if (checkSerial(args[0]) == false )
System.exit(0);

System.out.println("Hello World!");
}
}


Corresponding ant file to build a jar file for the project,

<project name="hello" default="def" basedir=".">

<target name="def">
<javac srcdir="." includes="hello.java" fork="yes"/>

<jar destfile="hello.jar" >
<manifest>
<attribute name="Main-Class" value="hello"/>
</manifest>
<fileset dir=".">
<include name="hello.class"/>
</fileset>
</jar>
</target>

</project>


Type,

ant


to build the application, it will create a hello.jar in the same directory.

Everyone says it is very easy to decompile Java applications, but actually how easy it is? My favorite tool for this job is the JD-GUI. Try opening the jar file we produced.

As you can see, for this application you do not need to do anything to crack it, serial is written in plain text. For demonstration purposes, assume that the checkSerial function is a proper algorithm to check if a serial is valid or not.

Now a cracker has two options at this point, he can learn the algorithm that checkSerial uses and create a serial that will pass the inspection, or we can patch the checkSerial function to return true no matter, what serial is passed.

I'll go with the second route, for this we'll use a library called Javassist, which allows you to manipulate bytecode.

Jar files are glorified zip files, so we can extract the content of the jar file using,

unzip hello.jar


Using the javassist we write a small snippet, that will read the bytecode rename the checkSerial function to something else then create a new function that will always return true and add that. Finally we write back the modified class file.

import javassist.*;

class smash{
public static void main(String[] argv) throws Exception{

//Load the class that we will be patching...
ClassPool pool = ClassPool.getDefault();
CtClass klass = pool.get("hello");

//Get the method we want to patch, and rename...
CtMethod orig = klass.getDeclaredMethod("checkSerial");
orig.setName( "checkSerial$impl" ); // Create a new function that will always return true... CtMethod patch = CtNewMethod.copy(orig, "checkSerial", klass, null); patch.setBody("{ return true; }"); // Add patched method.. klass.addMethod( patch ); klass.writeFile(); System.out.println("Done Patching."); CtMethod[] methods = klass.getDeclaredMethods(); for( int i=0; i<methods.length ; i++){ System.out.println( "\t" + methods[i].getLongName() ); } } }  Compile this file, javac -cp .:javassist.jar smash.java  Run it in the same directory containing the .class file, java -cp .:javassist.jar smash  You should see a output similar to, Done Patching. hello.checkSerial$impl(java.lang.String)
hello.main(java.lang.String[])
hello.checkSerial(java.lang.String)


Put back the patched .class file in to the jar file,

$zip hello.jar hello.class  Now we can run the application passing any serial we want, and it will work. $ java -jar hello.jar 34345345
Hello World!


Lets move to the other end of the spectrum, What can be done to prevent this attack?

Well, not much as long as the application runs on the hostile territory (user), it can be reversed and patched. You can however make reversing process harder, by obfuscating your class files.

Bytecode obfuscators, protects your class files by replacing package, class, method, and field names with inexpressive characters. Some bytecode obfuscators do more than just name mangling such as scrambling your code flow in a way that makes it really hard to follow.

In my experience the obfuscator that causes the minimal amount of hassle is yGuard.

<!-- yGuard Ant task. -->
classpath="yguard.jar"/>
<!-- Integrated obfuscation and name adjustment... -->
<yguard>
<inoutpair in="./hello.jar" out="./hello-final.jar"/>

<rename logfile="./test.log" replaceClassNameStrings="true">
<property name="obfuscation-prefix" value="name"/>
<keep>
<class name="hello"/>
<method name="void main(java.lang.String[])"
class="hello" />
</keep>
</rename>
</yguard>


We add the yGuard task to our build process, we keep the main class intact not to break the jar file, if we open the resulting jar file "hello-final.jar" in the JD-GUI,

We see that the method name has been changed to A, well for this simple example it is still trivial to figure out what is going on but in a code base composed of 100's of class files, it becomes pretty hard to figure out what is going on.

There are other schemes in the tubes, such as encrypting the class files then load them with a custom class loader, well the problem people don't get is if you want it to run on a CPU, it has to be decoded at some point and can be reversed.